Cyber sex chat no sign in

Taliaferro said in her client's case, he was convicted based solely on an Internet chat he claims was purely sexual fantasy.James Gallegos, of Clearfield, was charged and convicted by a jury of enticing a 13-year-old girl over the Internet. In actuality, the 13-year-old was an adult agent with the Utah Attorney General's Internet Crimes Against Children task force.He said he was "troubled" by the law and concerned about its constitutionality.In this case, Wilkins said it appeared all the state needed to do to convict someone was to go online, set up a meeting for sex and that is enough.

Gallegos is also taking issue with a judge's denial of an expert witness, a doctor who would testify that Gallegos was not attracted to minor girls and was therefore not a pedophile.

Ultimately, the agent and Gallegos arranged a meeting outside a school in Sandy.

While Gallegos did drive by the meeting spot, officers said he sped off.

Durham pointed out that Gallegos went beyond sexual talk and into soliciting someone who claimed they were a minor. She added if a man walked up to a 13-year-old on the street and solicited sex, what would be the difference?

"It is the solicitation, the inducement, the allure.

Search for Cyber sex chat no sign in:

Cyber sex chat no sign in-16Cyber sex chat no sign in-83

According to court documents, Gallegos chatted with the agent on two occasions in 2006.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “Cyber sex chat no sign in”